Speaking of the Unspeakable

The Holocaust and the Henmaid's Tale: a Case for Comparing Atrocities by Karen
Davis. New York, Lantern Books, 2005. 160 pages. $18.


Founder and president of                                      Karen Davis has played the major role in
taking domestic fowl - the most abused and violated animals in America - from the neglected
margins of the animal protection movement to their present status as a central focus of
campaigns against factory farming. Her books, Prisoned Chickens, Poisoned Eggs and More
than a Meal: The Turkey in History, Myth, Ritual, and Reality are the standard animal rights
works on domestic fowl.

Her newest book, The Holocaust and the Henmaid's Tale, is an invaluable contribution to one
of the most contentious debates plaguing the animal rights community. But to understand
why, we have to make a quick trip back in time.

A Holocaust: It's What's for Dinner
Isaac Bashevis Singer was a Jewish refugee from Hitler's Europe whose haunting novels and
stories form an extended meditation on the Holocaust. In one of those stories, "The Letter
Writer," the protagonist observes that "In relation to [animals], all people are Nazis; for the
animals it is an eternal Treblinka."

In 2002, holocaust historian Charles Patterson picked up on Singer's theme. Eternal Treblinka:
Our Treatment of Animals and the Holocaust argued that morally, psychologically, and
logistically our imprisonment and murder of animals is equivalent to the Nazis' treatment of
Jews, Gypsies, homosexuals, and other victims of their blandly efficient murder machine.

In 2003, PETA launched a traveling display inspired by Patterson's book. Juxtaposing
photographs of human prisoners in Nazi concentration camps with eerily similar pictures of
animal prisoners in factory farm concentration camps, The Holocaust on Your Plate was a
vivid and moving indictment of animal enslavement and murder.

A firestorm of criticism quickly ensued, summarized in an Anti-Defamation League press
release calling the display "abhorrent," and asserting that "Abusive treatment of animals should
be opposed, but cannot and must not be compared to the Holocaust. The uniqueness of
human life is the moral underpinning for those who resisted the hatred of Nazis and others
ready to commit genocide even today." The issue split the animal rights community. Some
activists defended the PETA display; others worried that the animals' cause would suffer from
the backlash.

Into these whitewater rapids, Roberta Kalechofsky, founder and president of Jews for Animal
Rights, launched Animal Suffering and the Holocaust: The Problem with Comparisons, a
small book (59 pages) in which she argued that while our enslavement and murder of animals
is a horrific crime that must be stopped, comparisons to the Jewish holocaust are illegitimate.
(Kalechofsky's bona fides as an animal rights advocate are unassailable. For more than two
decades, she has been a powerful and pioneering voice for animals.)

First, Kalechofsky argues that the Jewish holocaust was the end product of centuries of
historical and cultural evolution that make it a unique event that cannot be meaningfully
compared to anything else. And second, if the Jewish holocaust is allowed to become a
"generalized metaphor" (pg. 34) for every kind of atrocity, it becomes devalued and loses its
meaning.

From Treblinka to Tyson's
The Holocaust and the Henmaid's Tale is Karen Davis' rebuttal. Her "henmaid" is a battery
chicken on a factory farm, whose life of deprivation, devaluation, depersonalization, and early
uncomforted death reminds Davis of the eponymous "Handmaid" in Margaret Atwood's
dystopian novel - and of the victims of fascism in Hitler's camps. When she is talking about
her beloved chickens, Davis' compassion for the plight of our animal victims makes any
merely intellectual argument against comparing their suffering to ours seem facile and
self-serving.

It is on this foundation of bone deep compassion that Davis constructs her defense of
comparing atrocities. First, she argues that while every atrocity is a unique event in terms of
the historical, social, economic, and cultural conditions that led to it, they are all alike in the
suffering that they cause, and from a moral standpoint, it is the suffering that matters. Thus,
Davis argues that "An atrocity can be both unique and general." And since one sentient
individual can never truly feel the pain of another, comparisons of pain - metaphors of pain, if
you will - are the only way that we can feel empathy and compassion for others, and the only
way that we can learn to become moral beings. Thus, comparisons of atrocities are an
essential part of the process by which we become ethical individuals who create an ethical
society.

It is not the Jewish holocaust that is unique - from ancient times, genocide has been a
commonplace of human history - it is our sensitivity to it that is unique, and if this unique
sensitivity can be used to awaken a heightened moral awareness of other atrocities, including
the atrocities we commit against animals, that is a valid and valuable use of the holocaust
metaphor.

The Holocaust and the Henmaid's Tale is not a diatibe. It is, in fact, solidly within the tradition
of the best kind of academic writing, judicious, carefully reasoned, free of jargon, and
accessible to the general reader.

Quoting Isaac Bashevis Singer, Davis reminds us that, "[T]here is no evidence that people are
more important than chickens." Then she adds, "There is no evidence, either, that human
suffering, or Jewish suffering, is separate from all other suffering, or that it needs to be kept
separate in order to maintain its identity. But where, it may be asked, is the evidence that we
humans have had enough of inflicting massive, preventable suffering on one another and on
the individuals of other species, given that we know suffering so well and claim to abhor it?"